|
|
Post by kedigato on Aug 12, 2009 18:54:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by DAG on Aug 13, 2009 6:24:32 GMT
Lovely pics kedi, and what a beautiful lake, I am wondering where that is?
I can imagine how you felt though! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by linda on Aug 13, 2009 7:32:00 GMT
great pics kedi as dag said lovely lake, i guess in attack mode the swans wings would of been up and it would make hissing noises
|
|
|
|
Post by nazimundo on Aug 13, 2009 21:38:38 GMT
Lovely pics Kedi, the lake looks very beautiful.
I bet Peter was ready to beat a hasty retreat ;D
Alfie
|
|
|
|
Post by tamarine on Sept 2, 2009 18:55:05 GMT
Swan lake how appropriate I can imagine the swans dancing on the water ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by capney on Dec 16, 2009 19:53:53 GMT
Heres my Swan Lake..enjoy  |
|
|
|
Post by kedigato on Dec 16, 2009 20:21:56 GMT
What a fantastic shot, Robert! Well done.  You can see that not all of the wing feathers are opened up in the display mode (if that is what it is called). I thought they were. Very interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by DAG on Dec 16, 2009 21:53:19 GMT
That's a cracking shot Robert, well done indeed! |
|
|
|
Post by linda on Dec 18, 2009 0:52:32 GMT
fantastic photo robert well done just love it |
|
|
|
Post by capney on Apr 7, 2010 17:33:37 GMT
We can all take pictures of swans, but what do you think of this process?  |
|
|
|
Post by kedigato on Apr 7, 2010 21:18:43 GMT
What did you do, Robert? The water looks interesting, but the swan has a dirty neck and head.  That is probably not what you wanted to hear and I'm sure I'd like the original better. Sorry. We're still friends though, aren't we? |
|
|
|
Post by DAG on Apr 7, 2010 21:42:41 GMT
Not sure what to think Robert as I don't know what the original looked like in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Post by capney on Apr 8, 2010 15:51:37 GMT
Its my attempt at being a tad artistic... Its called the orten effect and is just another way of manipulating images.
But.. I do appreciate your comments.
|
|
|
|
Post by DAG on Apr 9, 2010 5:30:51 GMT
Can we see the original then Robert, so that we can judge what it does more accurately?
I am more interested in the effect that it has on the water, I like that but confused about the effect on the swan. It seems that the swan has a hole in its neck so that you can see the body behind but it can't be? Must be a piece of the image that has got copied over and lines up by shear coincidence?
|
|
|
|
Post by kedigato on Apr 9, 2010 6:34:48 GMT
I can't see the hole in the neck, DAG. Do you mean about 1/3 down? Looks to me like the feathers are laying differently than the rest of the neck.
|
|
